I did once match him target for target, the only difference was, I was shooting from the recognized stands, he was shooting from the next layout, an additional 30 yards away !
While I am not directly familiar with the process or any precedents, I do not believe the NSCA can overrule any DQ at this point; it can only add further punishment like suspension or expulsion and this is what's under appeal right now. The rules allow the club to manage any DQ and there's an appeal process for that which would have been exhausted before the DQ was announced. Nationals are running now in TX so all the players are down there right now but once it's over, I can ask my national delegate what's under appeal, the DQ or the additional NSCA punishment.
Not sure which nation you're referring to but if 'it's the US you could not be more right tho I never bother to watch NFL kinda "football"... . Nothing less than a disgrace IMO and it's everywhere starting with the Orange Clown who promotes it daily. the English football that I see is absolutely a model of civility compared.
Yes altered card BUT altered by who? Was he seen to do it OR did a ref do it at the stand after he had shot. In other words did anybody see him do it. His defense may be that the scorer put in the wrong score altered the card but not the official score sheet? See this sort of thing does not occur in trap because the shooter never gets near the score card other than to sign for his score after the round has finished.
He has been very open about this in the media actually.
Sorry but I don't get that at all, why would a solid person with good mental wherewithal be any different to a snowflake when it comes to being accused of cheating ? I'd have thought he'd be anxious/troubled with the entire thing top to bottom. Clay shooting (and the sponsorship that comes with it in his case) and clay coaching is almost certainly his main source of income if not passion, nobody can take that lightly regardless of how strong you are.
Yes I know... why have you been so selective when quoting my post? I go much further than what you quoted!
Your post was moderately long one and I was agreeing/commenting on one specific facet so to me would seem superfluous to quote your entire post.
Having both come from playing rugby, I'd be surprised if he's as bothered as you think he is about people's opinions on a forum... if you are, you don't tend to last long in that sport especially if you play at a decent level, however with important areas which actually matter such as the opinion of sponsors, etc. it might well be a different story but that's not what I said. On top of that, it's commonplace for professional sportsmen to be aware of forums and websites talking nonsense about them and the ones who are solid generally have the ability to rise above it, at least that's what they all tend to say. It's the snowflakes as you call them that fall away because they can't handle a different type of pressure to the one that's created when performing at the top level. Haters are always gonna hate, even when you're squeaky clean.
Perhaps I’m not a sensible person then?
He's posted about his eye dominance rail in the last day, so there's no doubt he's on here. But this is a forum, I don't see much benefit in him commenting on this as there'll always be some who have their own unchangeable opinion regardless of any facts, so why bother? Don't let the truth get in the way of a good story.
