DT11

[chippy]

I will now use the word "pish" as often as I possible can.

You looked a little "pished off" after the shoot off yesterday ed

chippy

 

[EdSolomons]

That's because I was too jaded after a night on the pish previously!

 

[Hamster]

Did manage to shoot the dt11 yesterday as for recoil it was little different then my dt10 and to be honest prob a little more so! oddly enough andy riches shot it and said it was heavier on recoil then his 687eell must admit the build is really nice but not enough to make me part with that sort of money considering you can buy a mint dt10 with very little use for less then £2500 now Me thinks for that money your creeping into good perazzi territory.

Missed my chance it seems, I had no idea they were demo guns . I would be prepared to take bets that weight for weight, there is no difference between the DT10/DT11 recoil. Whatever argument they want to use is fine by me, I have Newton on my side. :wink:

 

[Darkside]

Yes there is Hamster!!! Shot 3" mags through both!!! There is a difference.......

 

[Hamster]

Yes there is Hamster!!! Shot 3" mags through both!!! There is a difference.......

Well then someone at Beretta ought to register a new scientific fact, it will have repercussions throughout our world. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, recoil is directly related to speed and weight of ejecta V the medium it is fired from. Hence a slow 24 g load through a 9 lb gun recoils less than a fast 28 g load through a 7 lbs field gun, fit can be left out for this exercise.

The reason it recoils less is the same as the K80 Parcours being better than ever before :wink: :wink: , if you get my meaning.

 

[Darkside]

Well then someone at Beretta ought to register a new scientific fact, it will have repercussions throughout our world. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, recoil is directly related to speed and weight of ejecta V the medium it is fired from. Hence a slow 24 g load through a 9 lb gun recoils less than a fast 28 g load through a 7 lbs field gun, fit can be left out for this exercise.

The reason it recoils less is the same as the K80 Parcours being better than ever before :wink: :wink: , if you get my meaning.

More pish........

 

[** Pending Removal **]

Barrel selector????

 

[Darkside]

Barrel selector????

Even more pish.......

 

[Chard]

Barrel selector????

Pish up a rope

 

[** Pending Removal **]

They have ropes on them??? V

 

[Hamster]

More pish........

Au Contraire, factual pish.

 

[Westward]

They have ropes on them??? V

Only on Perazzis. They stop the barrels falling off.

 

[** Pending Removal **]

Only on Perazzis. They stop the barrels falling off.

Obviously not familiar with one then eh??......from that description..........

 

[Shaun Hopkins]

Missed my chance it seems, I had no idea they were demo guns . I would be prepared to take bets that weight for weight, there is no difference between the DT10/DT11 recoil. Whatever argument they want to use is fine by me, I have Newton on my side. :wink:

Would not worry to much you would have been sorely dissapointed after all the hype was shocked to get the oppertunity to shoot it let alone get my hands on it GMK knew all along thats why they guarded it like the world trade secrets. also anyone who thinks beretta have somehow got passed newtons law with the dt11 should have tried harder at school......

 

[Skeet UK]

Well then someone at Beretta ought to register a new scientific fact, it will have repercussions throughout our world. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, recoil is directly related to speed and weight of ejecta V the medium it is fired from. Hence a slow 24 g load through a 9 lb gun recoils less than a fast 28 g load through a 7 lbs field gun, fit can be left out for this exercise.

The reason it recoils less is the same as the K80 Parcours being better than ever before :wink: :wink: , if you get my meaning.

The Physics remains intact...they just choose not to tell you which variable they have changed.

The over-bore that they use, reduces velocity a touch, which in turn reduces recoil. You may recall the shouting about it having closer to an 11 Bore than a 12?

They just choose not to shout too much about the drop in velocity, as those who believe it is the be all and end all, would be upset!

 

[Darkside]

Now we have, Skeet.......King of pish!!!

 

[Skeet UK]

Now we have, Skeet.......King of pish!!!

Yeah, I suppose that could be an unofficial title

I just say it like it is

 

[chippy]

That's because I was too jaded after a night on the pish previously!

That would explain all the bottles of water then.when i looked in your bag i thought you were going to shoot the round with a water pistol.

 

[hnachaj]

I had a DT10L and have a DT11. There IS a noticeable difference in "percieved" recoil! There are many ways to reduce "percieved" recoil. Besides the laws of physics of ejecta, powder weight and velocity, there is also the difference recoil curve by using different burning rates for the powder to either shorten or lenghten the pressure curve. AN excellent example is the RC Red Supernik which a faster shell but has less physical recoil than the similar RC4. I do have the ballistic tests to prove it!

Henry

 

[EdSolomons]

Ha! That actually made me laugh out loud! Next time you see Adam ask to see the video from the previous evening....