chippy
Well-known member
Anyone know what the Lewis system of classifications is. I shot a supersporting at high lodge today and that's what they are using. I only hit an 80 but got joint high in gold class so it seems ok to me
Think lottery ticket. Utter nonsense in terms of actual merit. It just divides the results list into equal bands and announces winner of each band. If you had shot one more clay you would have got nothing, as last in next āclassā up. Idiotic bilge.ĀAnyone know what the Lewis system of classifications is. I shot a supersporting at high lodge today and that's what they are using. I only hit an 80 but got joint high in gold class so it seems ok to me
I think it's the futureThink lottery ticket. Utter nonsense in terms of actual merit. It just divides the results list into equal bands and announces winner of each band. If you had shot one more clay you would have got nothing, as last in next āclassā up. Idiotic bilge.Ā
There's barely any real manipulation going on, certainly none that will last more than 6 months and even then you would pay more in entering and supposedly manipulating Ā Ā your scores than you would pick up in winnings ! Examples of X wining big in a major are :Personally, I love the Lewis system. Ā It totally eliminates the "target management" class poachers just for starters. Ā EVERY classification system is arbitrarily formulated and they all ignore the simple fact that there are no two sporting courses alike and conditions change in a totally random manner.Ā Ā Courses even change at the same grounds!!!Ā Other classification systems are absolutely incapable of accommodating anything but some simple mindedĀ percentage-based supposed reflective of ability A-B-C-etc. Ā Talk about idiotic!!Ā Not to mention subject to manipulation.
Lewis system OTOH involves only the people at the actual event, has no constraints imposed by course difficulty or conditions, is subject to no manipulation, and reflects the abilities and performances atĀ that single event untainted by any other considerations.
The Lewis is IMO second only to no classes whatsoever and would be about even with a win-based points system of classification.
And, Mr. Hewland, a participant subject to ANY classification system can be one target in or out of the money and the only solution to that is no classes at all. Ā
Me tooI am so glad that I no longer take my clay shooting seriouslyĀ !
I do NOT think that both you and I together could beat that X fellaĀ !Ā Ā ĀMe too
So it only works in Wonderland then?Itās full name is the Lewis Carroll system.
Hmmmm - I'm sure you actually know what I meantYou most definitely can be one target outĀ and drop out of the prizes but not one target in and lose.Ā
Neither do far the majority of shooters. Whether it is a consequence of theĀ class system or simple ineptitude is difficult to say. Ā How often do, say, D Class shooters win D Class shooting D Class scores? Ā I'd be betting that the answer is NEVER. Ā So what is the purpose of having a D Class?But what do I know? I never win anything
Surely that's obvious, so we reward improvement and not mediocrity. If the Lewis system rewards everyone equally (through luck) then it's not measuring nor rewarding excellence.ĀHmmmm - I'm sure you actually know what I meant
Neither do far the majority of shooters. Whether it is a consequence of theĀ class system or simple ineptitude is difficult to say. Ā How often do, say, D Class shooters win D Class shooting D Class scores? Ā I'd be betting that the answer is NEVER. Ā So what is the purpose of having a D Class?
Exactly Hamid,Ā the point of having a D class is to rise out of it! So while you are showing that you have improved, you will of course be shooting scores that exceed the grading boundary point of the class. Durr.. Then they upgrade you to C class or whatever. Apart from anything else it gives meaning to shooting. Otherwise itās just noise pollution and damaging ashtrays.Ā
Both spurious statements that would take more time to refute than worthSurely that's obvious, so we reward improvement and not mediocrity. If the Lewis system rewards everyone equally (through luck) then it's not measuring nor rewarding excellence.Ā
Talk about missing the point! The class system means you are placed among people of your broad ability at the START of the day. Previous performance is the only measure we have for classifying people. Take a low class shooter who is just starting to progress. If you FINISHĀ the day well, itās hardly logical to thenĀ revoke yourĀ classification! (Effectively what Lewis does).Ā Thatās just a ridiculous carrot on a stick, making winning out of reach if you stupidly have any success on the day, as it is penalised by your being promoted upwards to obscurity.Both spurious statements that would take more time to refute than worth
If one shoots an out of class score then that score should be judged by the appropriate class, and the shooter promoted to reward him/her for the accomplishment.Ā The highest score shot within the class boundary should win that class.Ā THAT is the intent of classes - Equity among the similarly ranked shooters and placement according to skill.Ā Lower class shooters posting higher class scores and receiving the lower class award is a subversion of the intent of classification system.Ā Of course that is in practise totally ignored.
that is why Lewis is superior because the SCORE sets theĀ class assignment with nothing else required.Ā Ā
Enter your email address to join: