Does the 'number' not refer to the percentage of light the lens allows through ? I have just sold a reddish sort of coloured lens which was numbered 65 HD. I understood it was a 65% light intake and the HD was High Definition. I have recently bought a '44N' which is purple coloured and again I believe that means it allows 44% light in and the N is for Neutraliser to help kill the background, thus highlighting the clay. Ed Lyons off here is your man. He is extremely helpful when it comes to specs. Have a look on You Tube too, search Pilla shooting glasses.I'm using a pair of Pilla Panther glasses and would like to change the lenses to a Vermilion colour. Can you tell me please what Pilla's designated number is, for this colour?
Even better if you're selling some
Ok, thanks for that. I think those lenses would have been ideal. I thought the numbers denoted the colour, as I've only seen adds for glasses with the frame and a bunch of numbers for the lenses, never colours by name.Does the 'number' not refer to the percentage of light the lens allows through ? I have just sold a reddish sort of coloured lens which was numbered 65 HD. I understood it was a 65% light intake and the HD was High Definition. I have recently bought a '44N' which is purple coloured and again I believe that means it allows 44% light in and the N is for Neutraliser to help kill the background, thus highlighting the clay. Ed Lyons off here is your man. He is extremely helpful when it comes to specs. Have a look on You Tube too, search Pilla shooting glasses.
I believe there are a couple of outlets that will let you try before you buyI must have about 18 pairs of glasses of various colours, all cheap-ish (well compared to Pilla anyway). Whatever brand/make, it's always the vermillion that gets worn the most. I think it's something to do with having a red, green deficiency (colour blindness).
With the Pillas, I've been using the orange 40max which are okay but I feel a vermillion would be better. But at £160+ a pop, I would like to be reasonably sure that they will do the job, before committing myself to buy. Now if I could find a lense like the one @westley sold for 50 quid, I could then try them for a week or two before deciding.
I believe work has already started.I thought mid Wales Shooting School was now going to be a caravan site ???
I do notice a big difference with red/vermillion lenses. I prefer the wrap around type glasses, but with the cheaper glasses there tends to be quite a bit of distortion around the curved areas.If you have (personal) red/green colour perception issue then it will be beyond us to recommend a lens type. Have a chat with an optician or speak to Ed Lyons. I too have more glasses than I need and have probably spent as much as a visit to Ed, and the right set in the first place !!.
A visit to a Pilla dealer may help. Try on what they have a noting both what you like and (just as important) what you don’t – too much yellow, orange, brown whatever. Also take note of the light transmission. You can then refer to the Pilla site for comparisons with the available options - https://pillasport.com/collections/shooting - I do wonder if the 28CR and 48RHC are more suited to you if you know you need more red/vermillion. You are unlikely to find the “odd” lenses on eBay or available second hand.
The one thing I did recently was take 5 or 6 lenses with me on a couple of occasions and try them in the same conditions. It was a hassle but it did make me realise that in low light I benefit from a more yellow/orange lens (up to 45% & I use the 54HC or 52CHC) and in bright light something more orange/red (in fact I can manage with 55% but use the 40MAX). You can use your 40MAX as a base reference lens. This is all however personal to me.
Enter your email address to join: