Shaun Hopkins
Well-known member
Just standard factory teagues invector + Matt as with most mk38s I guess...
Absolutely, nothing new under the sun as they say and as long as you're savvy enough to read between the lines (which I know you happen to be) and glean the right info from amongst the hype, then all is well in the land of choke selection.Emmsy said:the 1 2 3 4 system isnt anything special, its just like buying skeet, 3/8, 5/8, 7/8 instead of cyl, skeet, 1/4, 3/8, 1/2, 5/8, 3/4, 7/8, full
Not a dumb question as in reality you would surely be right but if this was the case then skeet chokes would be the obvious choice for sporting hedging your bets so to speak however as we know many top end shooters use quite the opposite, for me personally I like to be in the middle choke wise giving good breaks but a reasonable spread. :nyam:A dumb question - but, if everyone says that a choke gives a great break (which I assume means obliterating a clay) then surely it means that the shooter can afford to open up and reduce the shot density? Surely it is optimal to have a shot density that means only a couple of bits of shot hit the clay and thus have a wider margin for error?
Smoking a clay, as you say suggests a good hit, but...you only get that with lots of choke/centred pattern.A dumb question - but, if everyone says that a choke gives a great break (which I assume means obliterating a clay) then surely it means that the shooter can afford to open up and reduce the shot density? Surely it is optimal to have a shot density that means only a couple of bits of shot hit the clay and thus have a wider margin for error?
Could not have put it better myself have dropped many a clay through trying to improve a previously chippy break by over leading the next one instead of just doing the same its all about confidence for me :nyam:I think chokes are all a mind game, 1/4 choke will kill almost anything on any ground as long as you shoot in the right place. However if you get a nice puff of dust, it builds confidence, where as a back edge chip builds nerves. helps in the mind games...
As I mentioned I don't disagree with the conclusions, as you have said others on other forums agree & Mr Muller does talk a lot of sense at times but he also gets it wrong. My hang up was not what he said on the post you highlighted but the forum he runs.When I copy and pasted this from ShotgunWorld I wasn't aware it belonged to his forum, there are a number of other related threads that would serve the same purpose, but you have to admit though that coming from someone who has had reason to test to see if HE could offer a wider spread solution than Cylinder then it has to be taken seriously.
All manufacturers make claims, Teague (used to at any rate) claim the profile of their chokes led to reduced recoil :comando: , other ported versions from a multitude of suppliers claim the same :banghead: , but ultimately you just have to pick something that suits you. What you cannot deny is that there are several claims made by Muller that ARE provable such as their lightness, the fact they don't work loose as readily as others, they do remain clean and their 1234 system of overlapping chokes IS simpler with zero drawback.
And that is my philosophy as well, buy shooting stuff because its shiny and cool, got to be shiny.they are black and shiney...will they make you a world champion no......but my K80 has go faster stripes, they look cool
yours sincerely
Mr Shallow
Dorset
Enter your email address to join: