Nicky T
Well-known member
I shot the Westfield 120 ESP Registered on Sunday and had a chance to test myself on some great targets. One particular stand (stand 1 I think) in the corner at the top had a pacey low right to left white clay that had a slight loop to its trajectory followed by a slower, but higher, left to right chandelle. The first target really got the better of me for the first three pairs; giving it what I thought it needed, then double that amount, then half the original amount.
On the final pair I thought I've got nothing to lose so I'm just going to stare at the clay and let the gun go wherever I put it, with complete disregard to the position of the barrels in relation to the clay. I absolutely destroyed it with one of the most convincing breaks of my round.
Clearly there were very different approaches used with varying results, but to put them into specific categories I would classify trying to use an exact amount of leed as "scientific" and forcing yourself to focus on the clay as shooting instinctively or with "feel". If I had to assess the round as a whole I would say my approach was probably 80% scientific and 20% feel; although the "feel" shots all resulted in broken targets whereas the scientific ones did not always.
What percentage of each approach (scientific vs. feel) does your shooting have?
A couple of weeks ago I shot Southdown with the split of approach between scientific/feel probably 20%/80%, with my overall score 20% higher than at Westfield. I have no doubt which approach is favourable, but I wonder what evidence there is (if any) of being able to learn sight pictures subconsciously whilst shooting instinctively? If none, is it commonplace to shoot scientifically in practice and hope that you can revert to instinctive shooting come the day of the competition?
On the final pair I thought I've got nothing to lose so I'm just going to stare at the clay and let the gun go wherever I put it, with complete disregard to the position of the barrels in relation to the clay. I absolutely destroyed it with one of the most convincing breaks of my round.
Clearly there were very different approaches used with varying results, but to put them into specific categories I would classify trying to use an exact amount of leed as "scientific" and forcing yourself to focus on the clay as shooting instinctively or with "feel". If I had to assess the round as a whole I would say my approach was probably 80% scientific and 20% feel; although the "feel" shots all resulted in broken targets whereas the scientific ones did not always.
What percentage of each approach (scientific vs. feel) does your shooting have?
A couple of weeks ago I shot Southdown with the split of approach between scientific/feel probably 20%/80%, with my overall score 20% higher than at Westfield. I have no doubt which approach is favourable, but I wonder what evidence there is (if any) of being able to learn sight pictures subconsciously whilst shooting instinctively? If none, is it commonplace to shoot scientifically in practice and hope that you can revert to instinctive shooting come the day of the competition?