The reason that you may see a few Mirooks/Brownings with a hic-up or two is the fact that many people simply carry on with a gun (any gun) until breaks! Because these guns go on for years seems to make some people think that they do not need to get the things serviced properly, I've seen it a thousand times, in fact my own son is one such guilty party! My 3800 has had about 150,000 to 180,000 shells through it in almost 22 years and it has NEVER failed! Yes I am one of those people that has a gun service at least once a year and will often have the springs replaced as a matter of course, the same goes for the firing pins.My Mirook was an MK60 30" Teagued which I struggled with for over 4 years. Despite being anal about maintenance it still had the common little niggles like sticky top lever, cocking rod popping out of the slot and variable trigger pulls. Funnily enough I had no problems with the firing pins but they were well on the way south when I sold it. Also, in my fairly limited reffing experience, I have noticed that when a shooter has a failure to fire with an O/U that isn't a shell problem, it's almost always a Miroku or Browning.
I can see why people like them and I'll always have a soft spot, but I'm too mechanically sensitive, the diametric opposite of heavy handed, and I just can't slap or mash the trigger. I always treat it gently and when the pull weight goes heavy (or light) 4 or 5% of the time such as with my MK60 it costs me a lot of lost targets. Very very unlikely I'd ever consider another until they redesign them.
Beretta 68X types and derivatives like the SV10s don't have those niggles. They feel nice in my hands and they work reliably without having to be built like the Forth bridge or have the barrels cleaned religiously to avoid rust.
Top end guns don't interest me much. I've got better ideas for the odd £7-10K than spending it on a shotgun, but I really do want to have a go with a current Zoli. Round about the right money and maybe the right gun too.
I respect your view mate, I am a qualified engineer and also a bit of a pedant when it comes to maintaing a gun, I appreciate how delicate a process it is to get triggers just so! Yes I am probably a bit OTT with regard to such things, but I have not had a Mirook fail EVER!I'm sure you're right Les and indeed I've heard others say the same.
But in my view it shouldn't be necessary to have the triggers reworked or send a gun in for annual service. I'm not a big volume shooter but in 6 years with 2 Berettas I've never felt the need to get either one serviced. I'm not qualified in mech engineering but I have an engineering background and looking at the internals I can't see what would need servicing. I pull the stock about once a year, pop out the ejectors for a clean up every few thousand, keep the vitals lubed and forget about it.
As I do. My dad was an instrument maker, a breed apart that is now extinct. He had "the hands" which he genetically passed to me and even though I went into electronics, working with and understanding mechanical devices has always come easily and naturally. Because of this I can see that the very basic "design" of the trigger mechanism in a Mirook/Browning using top hung sears activated by a 4 stage coupled linkage may be reliable and trouble free but it can never hope to match the pull quality of the more elegant designs.I appreciate how delicate a process it is to get triggers just so!
Enter your email address to join: