All views welcomed, but more aimed at the instructors that frequent this forum .............................. just something I've often wondered.........
When I've had coaching, I've always gone to an instructor that's better than me (however you choose to define that - titles, classification, averages etc.) as I look to learn from them & raise myself to the next level. I've never quite subscribed to the view, that you don't have to be a top level competitor to be a top level coach. Surely for credibility, you have to have performed at, or around the given level you're coaching at? Is this view too simplistic, do you coach up to your standard or beyond? Would you be comfortable saying to someone "I can't do anything else for you, it's time to move on"?
Discuss.....
When I've had coaching, I've always gone to an instructor that's better than me (however you choose to define that - titles, classification, averages etc.) as I look to learn from them & raise myself to the next level. I've never quite subscribed to the view, that you don't have to be a top level competitor to be a top level coach. Surely for credibility, you have to have performed at, or around the given level you're coaching at? Is this view too simplistic, do you coach up to your standard or beyond? Would you be comfortable saying to someone "I can't do anything else for you, it's time to move on"?
Discuss.....