Wonko the Sane
Well-known member
Like I said before - nothing "slows". The gas has not ceased to exert its force on the ejecta or the gun. The rate of acceleration may slow (infinitesimally) but the fluidity of the ejecta and the relatively incremental decrease on the bore due to choke does not affect the velocity in any measurable way as cylinder and full give the same measured speeds.
You rocket analogy is not sound as well. There is no spike in anything as the ejecta leaves the barrel as the containment vessel has ceased to exist. the expanding gas that has been pushing on the gun all this while(and decreasing in pressure all the while) (you do understand how that works, right?) is suddenly subject to a massive drop in pressure and resulting cessation of action on the gun. You are correct that there are minute forces in action but your reductio ad absurdum grain of rice business is just that. You can add a multitude of infinitesimals and still not have anything but an infinitesimal. A bigger infinitesimal?
Here's something my first calculus professor passed along. He called it the "for all practical purposes" tool.
And as for the headspace thing - lovely little calc with massive numbers. I'd like to see some recoil/pressure data out of a pressure gun with increasing headspace documented. I'd also be interested in seeing that Krieghoff data to support the swell anecdote. Was it ever published?
I think I'm gonna do something important now. I have some nails need trimming.
You rocket analogy is not sound as well. There is no spike in anything as the ejecta leaves the barrel as the containment vessel has ceased to exist. the expanding gas that has been pushing on the gun all this while(and decreasing in pressure all the while) (you do understand how that works, right?) is suddenly subject to a massive drop in pressure and resulting cessation of action on the gun. You are correct that there are minute forces in action but your reductio ad absurdum grain of rice business is just that. You can add a multitude of infinitesimals and still not have anything but an infinitesimal. A bigger infinitesimal?
Here's something my first calculus professor passed along. He called it the "for all practical purposes" tool.
And as for the headspace thing - lovely little calc with massive numbers. I'd like to see some recoil/pressure data out of a pressure gun with increasing headspace documented. I'd also be interested in seeing that Krieghoff data to support the swell anecdote. Was it ever published?
I think I'm gonna do something important now. I have some nails need trimming.