I don't think many would agree with that assessment. The general view is that DTs are solid, durable and long lasting premium guns.In my world, a DT10 and DT11 is a cheap and poor quality copy of an ASE90,
Thought you were asking about durability. How a gun feels and handles is down to personal taste.In my world, a DT10 and DT11 is a cheap and poor quality copy of an ASE90, the balance point at the receiver is also too high and heavy for me, it is also a construction that is almost as old as the Brownings.
A lot in gun construction has changed since they were born.
I'm mostly into Kemen, Perazzi and old Beretta S682.
I saw the qualities and innovation a BR460 has, and gave it a try, mine handles like an MX8, and the build quality seems top notch, in my view absolutely better value for money than, for example, the DT11.
Don´t agree with that. The basic locking mechanism is like the SO- Series. But the DT11 has modern barrel and choke design and on of the best and fastest triggers around.In my world, a DT10 and DT11 is a cheap and poor quality copy of an ASE90, the balance point at the receiver is also too high and heavy for me, it is also a construction that is almost as old as the Brownings.
A lot in gun construction has changed since they were born.
I'm mostly into Kemen, Perazzi and old Beretta S682.
I saw the qualities and innovation a BR460 has, and gave it a try, mine handles like an MX8, and the build quality seems top notch, in my view absolutely better value for money than, for example, the DT11.
Enter your email address to join: