Help Support Clay, Trap, Skeet Shooting Forum:
Jan Powell
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2012
- Messages
- 1,734
£600! (and i've seen the, dearer than that) Not only is that ridiculously expensive, it's completely unnecessary. There's glasses of identical performance for a quarter of the money.
S
Supercharged
Guest
I,m going to get the Randolphs I think
BenW
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2011
- Messages
- 638
I'm now selling the PILLA Outlaw X & Fugitive glasses.
I've tested most glasses out and I think they are by far the best. Very light weight and they have the best field of vision.
The red 52HC lens is the best in my opinion.
They are not cheap but if people rub me right I'll try and do a special price!!
I've tested most glasses out and I think they are by far the best. Very light weight and they have the best field of vision.
The red 52HC lens is the best in my opinion.
They are not cheap but if people rub me right I'll try and do a special price!!
P
** Pending Removal **
Guest
There is just no helping people with advice any more. Ed Lyons post was spot on. Also people's eyes are all different as they read colours.....so you cannot really advise others.......only how you find yours work for you.
Obviously there is going to be a big difference in people who embrace new technology.....and see it as value for money......and those who don't and won't .
The fact that 'you' whoever you are.....might think that it is expensive....does not really come into the equation for lots of people.
Obviously there is going to be a big difference in people who embrace new technology.....and see it as value for money......and those who don't and won't .
The fact that 'you' whoever you are.....might think that it is expensive....does not really come into the equation for lots of people.
Kasia To Be Fisher
Well-known member
very helpful posts ..
as I scratched Oakley`s which I never liked - brought pair on the british shooting show,
and I think the reasonable price and quality I can get for the Randolphs .. reading the posts, the only one thing worries me is the size..
as I am tiny, and my head is tiny :fie: sowonder how you get the size correct for yourself ?
Cheers
as I scratched Oakley`s which I never liked - brought pair on the british shooting show,
and I think the reasonable price and quality I can get for the Randolphs .. reading the posts, the only one thing worries me is the size..
as I am tiny, and my head is tiny :fie: sowonder how you get the size correct for yourself ?
Cheers
I'm now selling the PILLA Outlaw X & Fugitive glasses.
I've tested most glasses out and I think they are by far the best. Very light weight and they have the best field of vision.
The red 52HC lens is the best in my opinion.
They are not cheap but if people rub me right I'll try and do a special price!!
I bought a set of Outlaw X's but they suffer terribly from condensation inside the lens :fie:
EdLyons
Well-known member
Well I only wear a T-shirt in the snow in Winter so I must be Hot :crazy:
I've had to resort to buying anti fog spray for them. :hi:
I was just about to buy the 46N Lens for them but I'm not paying £185 for one lens, I'll wait
till I get out to America next week hopefully they are about $125 out there. :nyam:
I've had to resort to buying anti fog spray for them. :hi:
I was just about to buy the 46N Lens for them but I'm not paying £185 for one lens, I'll wait
till I get out to America next week hopefully they are about $125 out there. :nyam:
Last edited by a moderator:
EdLyons
Well-known member
The old Panther lenses yes as they are all discontinued now.
The new ViVx products are still the top end price, $900 for a 3lens kit
http://www.gamaliel.com/shootingglasses/pilla_glasses.asp?page=1
Ed - $900 for a 3 lens set? Isn't this a bit like High Def TV's? The human eye can see 10m different colours and hues (roughly) and only the central part of our vision can see in HD, this resolution decreases as it moves to the peripheral vision. So there is a natural limit, beyond which is totally pointless because your eyes won't or can't deal with it, bit like Super HD TV (4 times HD quality) totally pointless...
EdLyons
Well-known member
Don't know. I've got a portable black and white Toshiba. Been ages since there's been anything good on. Fiddled with the aerial too....
P
** Pending Removal **
Guest
True...but you do not shoot using your peripheral vision....you aquire the flash with it (if ness) then you shoot with centre vision because by then hopefully the eyes have the target :wink:
Ashley
Well-known member
I never doubted eds post for one minute, as I'm led to believe he is one of the best in his field. Just saying 600 bucks is a lot of money for the average shooter on a budget, shooting perhaps 2 or 3 registered shoots a month. what with entry's ,cartridges and fuel all on the up its hard to justify it all
P
** Pending Removal **
Guest
Quite right...you should always pick what you can afford. There are lots of choice out there.
I was replying as a competition shot who wants to get the most advantage possible.
Each to their own.
I was replying as a competition shot who wants to get the most advantage possible.
Each to their own.
