leighH
Well-known member
CPSA response to article now on the CPSA website.
No doubt that will have cost us another £10k.CPSA response to article now on the CPSA website.
Sorry not takeing side's but it's a bit wrong if you do wrong if you don't with regard to keeping members informed or not. Haveing said that I think the buck should stay at the top and we know where that is. If somebody is not able to keep a team together perhaps they should ask some questions of themselves.What other organisation does anyone know who publishes this sort of information? Most would not dignify the matter by writing for a response for further public discussion and debate! They might write to the magazine privately seeking their side of the story to be published or to request a retraction. They might comment at the AGM for the record in the minutes. If they think they were right to discipline Hames then there should be no need to comment further as they won the case and the appeal was dismissed so why dig a bigger hole by trying to justify themselves.
Personally I don't think that they should have opened the can of worms in the first place by disciplining Hames. They should have told him it was all legal and above board and to stop pestering them. If he persisted then they would be within their rights to say take us to court or shut up and to respond to Companies House and the Law Society if he complained to those organisations setting out that he was just be a nuisance and his queries had been dealt with.
It will be interesting to see what happens at the AGM
Enter your email address to join: