I switched over to these when Express Super went over £100 :smile:What are you paying for Superbs Hamster?
I switched over to these when Express Super went over £100 :smile:What are you paying for Superbs Hamster?
Do you carry both? What one of the two would you use on a 40yd edge on crosser if you had both?The 7.5 Clever T3 (UK 7) pattern so tighly they are a disadvantage for me on half the course through a half choke. The 8,s are great.
CSC3
I used to carry both, for that reason and agree it makes sense, physically. However, I found that the 8s would break it everytime (if I was on target). What happened is that because I only ever stuck in the 7.5 T3 for extreme targets; my hit rate wasn't good with them, so psychologically I associated them with missing! T2 8's for it all now, except for some very close stuff, where I use something else.Do you carry both? What one of the two would you use on a 40yd edge on crosser if you had both?
Not sure if it is an unintentional oversight; call me cynical but why is it that every time a maker brings out a good, economical shell there is something not quite right with it!!Yes that is a bit odd. Probably a trap based decision.
CSC3
I have an unhealthy interest in this subject and would be very interested in BenH's view point and why he thinks 7's and 8 should be carried together. If GD can break everything with 7.5's then why loose pellet count carrying 6.5's?Do you carry both? What one of the two would you use on a 40yd edge on crosser if you had both?
Yes but they're not in Rome now, if they market shells here intended for sporting shooters then 7's are an odd/wrong choice.Biodegradable clays in Italy, harder than normal clays.........so I'm told.
The UK sporting shooter is a very small part of Fiocchi's market!!!Yes but they're not in Rome now, if they market shells here intended for sporting shooters then 7's are an odd/wrong choice.
The only reason I carry a few 6.5's and 7's is purely mental and depending on the type of round I may not use any. Whilst I accept when your on the money, even something rangey and under power can be broken with a 9. Edge on stuff at a bit of range has to have a 7.5 minimum for me.I have an unhealthy interest in this subject and would be very interested in BenH's view point and why he thinks 7's and 8 should be carried together. If GD can break everything with 7.5's then why loose pellet count carrying 6.5's?
CleverSC3 is bang on the money with his take, if you carry big shot for long birds, by definition you will miss more often using them and psyche yourself out anyway. I shoot almost everything with 8's but carry a few 7.5's for going away birds, nowadays not because I believe they best 8's but because I use them as part of my mental routine and an aid in pacing myself.
I would love to spend a day with some boys like Ed, Glen etc testing long crossers and teal with different sizes. I have a sneaking suspicion 8's will win out. It's like this: 45 extra pellets in 8 compared to 7.5, the latter is 4.5% bigger so would arguably carry a minuscule amount more energy at 50 yards. First we have to find out if that will have a meaningful impact on whether an edge on clay will succumb given the other dozen or so factors, even if the answer is yes we are left with the reality that it has less chance to hit the thing in the first place. In the marginal scenario of a single strike, I'd rather have a tiny chance of a break (using 8's) than none (using 7.5's) .
Lets not get into the other argument of misshaped shot etc which we're told saps velocity and thus energy. The 8's have more probability of propelling true undamaged shot since a greater number of those are on the outside close to the barrel walls protecting the main bulk?!