I think the jury will be out for a long time after the shoot has ended as to whether making the shoot itself quite so demanding was the right thing to do. Yes of course we need to sort the men out from the boys but that gets done regardless if you're honest but having hard, edge on targets stand after stand can mean that it gets to favour a few specialists with excellent eye sight or worse, end up going one way or the other through the odd lucky strike as even GD seems to have alluded to.
You can sit back and study the names against the figures and make fairly safe estimations as to where you yourself may have ended up (within reason) and if that safely places you outside the top 30-50 or whatever, then it may just lead to it becoming a reason not to spend time and huge money attending such future events. Personally I think the formula needs to have a realistic aspect to the targets that allows the majority to compete, not just the tiny few who will have the time and space to practice on such awkward presentations.
You can sit back and study the names against the figures and make fairly safe estimations as to where you yourself may have ended up (within reason) and if that safely places you outside the top 30-50 or whatever, then it may just lead to it becoming a reason not to spend time and huge money attending such future events. Personally I think the formula needs to have a realistic aspect to the targets that allows the majority to compete, not just the tiny few who will have the time and space to practice on such awkward presentations.