Paul120
Well-known member
Not necessarily. You don't need to be Rocafeller or a Depp. A consultation fof this type of dispute and letter shouldn't break the bank. It doesn't need a team of leading Barristers.I would imagine that the barrels with the chokes up to 1/2 are tested for steel, and marked up accordingly. Most of the advice for steel is no more than 1/2 choke. Steel proofing is done at a much higher pressure than just for lead. You have to request the proofing for steel or it will only be done for lead. I don't think steel on steel comes into it, as far as I'm aware steel cartridges are still plas wad, and nobody makes fibre steel. As for chokes in the gun for proofing I would imagine so.
That's going to be an expensive route. Far cheaper to just buy another gun.
I had to look into this recently. It's a long story but I too though it was going to be not worth the cost, Once I found out it was actually quite reasonable it was the obvious next step.
If you have no chance or being unreasonable they will tell you. It's amassing how effective these letters are if you have a case and the other side is being obstructive or avasive.