Charlie,With 24gm loads my guns, 5/10, 9/10 both, have about a 6" pattern ( maybe smaller but I don't really want to know) at low7 distance which is about half way to center so more like 10 than 15. And I know where the gun shoots I just like to see it hahaha
"not be the same so mm here mm there is not as critical as one thinks." I would guess that mm here or there would for me be the difference between miss/broken/smoke. I try not to let the gunmount be a POI variable, but that could just be me. On the gun that I used to get my initial measurements one 1/16" washer under the comb was the broken/smoke difference.
I certainly have no interest in arguing about anything - I was just looking to add a constructive comment. Mea culpa It does seem to me tho that some people have some strange notions bio-mechanics and geometry. Over here there seem to be a good number of shooters that studied physics at Hogwarts. Perhaps the emphasis in GB at that unversity is directed slightly differently.
Charlie
That is a real danger when you think about it but I do like to see a lot of targetThe brain is a strange thing and not always on your side, a high comb sigh picture can make you think the gun is going to shoot high so you compensate and ride targets underneath which is of course where you'll miss ! :.: :.:
So we end up having the complete opposite affect to what's expected ! Been there done that, till I learned to accept my gun looks like a runway but shoots flat.
Oh Charles......it is definitely Hogwarts here toooooooo !!!!!....as you can see from many of the posts that people passionately put up ....with great detail in them (most of it supposition with pseudo scientific bollocx attached wishing you to see their point of view :laugh:With 24gm loads my guns, 5/10, 9/10 both, have about a 6" pattern ( maybe smaller but I don't really want to know) at low7 distance which is about half way to center so more like 10 than 15. And I know where the gun shoots I just like to see it hahaha
"not be the same so mm here mm there is not as critical as one thinks." I would guess that mm here or there would for me be the difference between miss/broken/smoke. I try not to let the gunmount be a POI variable, but that could just be me. On the gun that I used to get my initial measurements one 1/16" washer under the comb was the broken/smoke difference.
I certainly have no interest in arguing about anything - I was just looking to add a constructive comment. Mea culpa It does seem to me tho that some people have some strange notions bio-mechanics and geometry. Over here there seem to be a good number of shooters that studied physics at Hogwarts. Perhaps the emphasis in GB at that unversity is directed slightly differently.
Charlie
How very true, but when all is said and done you need that useful input in the first place, you know, something of substance, instead of all this.................I can only be bothered to laughatyall fairy talk.You know Nic I try not to characterise people on the forum by their posts. I say I try not to but sometimes I fail and can adopt an entirely different idea of a character, who it turns out is nothing like what I have assumed them to be! I think, possibly wrongly, that people away from a computer keyboard are entirely different to what you get online. I certainly know that when you talk in a room with someone the element of eye contact tells more about that person than can perceived notions in an online forum chat or a teleconference.
Anyway that's bye the bye what is required is good input to a debate .. that does not mean it has to be correct... its an opinion , an idea or concept that provokes thought and of course thoughts can then change one's point of view later on reflection. That's the thing about forums there is very rarely a situation where a person takes the time after reflecting on a particular debate and having changed their point of view gets back to the others and says " you know I have changed my mind about ..... you were right what you said makes much more sense" but this happen all the time after normal day to day discussions .
once again I entirely agree with my learned friend. I have eluded to the the same misconception re poi with high ribs, you percieve that it will shoot high of course some do such as the dt10x but that is because it was meant to and has a tapered rib. Generally a high comb on a flat rib does indeed give one the perception that it will shoot high but if you dont use the bead as an aiming tool the poi has effectively remaineed the same but your view above the rib has altered. After a lot and I mean a lot of testing and faffing with comb height my conclusion for me personaly was the flatter the better at least on a trap gun which will always shoot high ish poi even if you see no rib.. I see no benefit with having to shoot under a flat target in order to hit it I much prefer to have to push through the target but of course we are all different and what we think we see and do is not the same as what other people think they do or see. So its flat as possible and no adjustable comb for me.The brain is a strange thing and not always on your side, a high comb sigh picture can make you think the gun is going to shoot high so you compensate and ride targets underneath which is of course where you'll miss ! :.: :.: So we end up having the complete opposite affect to what's expected ! Been there done that, till I learned to accept my gun looks like a runway but shoots flat.
Enter your email address to join: