Will Hewland
Well-known member
Well said Tom. What we need is an average system that doesn't rely on number of clays hit. Oh wait..
Do you ever get that "déjà vous" feeling..................Well said Tom. What we need is an average system that doesn't rely on number of clays hit. Oh wait..
Mid Norfolk Sunday?Do you ever get that "déjà vous" feeling..................
Tell me about it..................you know me I always go with the flow..........mind you looking at the forecast it might be sensible.Mid Norfolk Sunday?
I disagree it should be done on the average score for the class on each shoot.If a shooter manages to shoot two scores two classes above their own in any one period they should be put up 1 class immediately. So a C class shot has a couple of 80s he/she instantly becomes a B class. I've read how good the new cpsa software is so it should be easy to do. Could this work?
I don't disagree with the idea it should be done quickly but I don't think that using the shooters score only is the right way different grounds throw different levels of targets...The idea is to stop somebody having a full 6 months of shooting in a class they are clearly not supposed to be in. That person may not be purposely sand bagging they have just progressed very quickly therefor the system should react quickly.
It could work both ways could it not!The scores achieved are not necessarily a pure reflection of the difficulty of the course. The average score in c could be low because a higher than normal amount of beginners happen to turn up on the day. Same at the top end if a shoot has a high proportion of big names attend the AAA figure is going to be distorted.
...don't let those fast progressors be rewarded for there talent of hard work for any more than a fortnight!!!The idea is to stop somebody having a full 6 months of shooting in a class they are clearly not supposed to be in. That person may not be purposely sand bagging they have just progressed very quickly therefor the system should react quickly.
Hardly fair on someone who has a reason for dropping down ie they get older or can't shoot as much etc...don't let those fast progressors be rewarded for there talent of hard work for any more than a fortnight!!!
I don't have a problem with someone improving and dominating a class for a classification period...I do however think that once someone is out of C class, they should NEVER go back down to C and once someone has made it to AA, they should NEVER go back into B class!!! Once you get to AA, that should be you cemented in A...You should only be able to move between A-AAA!!!
No, you should be allowed to drop back to A...but once you have reached the technical and mental ability to shoot AA scores, the understanding of correct hold points, a very sound understanding of method, you have learned the things that give you the concistancy to beat the best of C/B class shooters 9 times out of 10.I kind of agree James, but the system only let's you drop 1 class per period, which mostly fixes it. Imagine you are AA, then you get old and perhaps have age related illness. Should you be held in AA in perpetuity?
Enter your email address to join: