Thanks Mike, you're right in the respect that [for example] Coniston still holds selection shoots, although [unless Nicky T can correct me, him being CPSA NW rep] they don't do reg comps. Does Kelbrook still do reg comps? I've not yet shot Blackpool (and by all counts, it's a real tester of a ground), so must get that on my list.Two grounds who used to hold registered shoots, Kelbrook and Blackpool, did not stop running comps. because of complaints.
Why don't you contact the grounds and ask them why they stopped?
A question, if you go somewhere and receive bad service, do you say nothing or do you complain?
Definatley agree with that comment. I the past I've been to a lot of small shoots that present better clays to shoot and the atmosphere is much better too.I honestly cannot see what all the fuss is about Registered shoots.Many grounds find that registered are a nuisance to put on and often add unnecessary expense . Yes they are necessary to attain your average classification, but they certainly are not of a higher quality or a measure of ones ability. Hodnet & Cross Gun Kinver, are a prime example good courses but not registered.
And this is part of the problem for shooters Sal - when grounds like Hodnet (arguably the best shooting ground in the country) can't be bothered putting on reg comps, it creates a hole - and again, it's a telling indictment on reg comps. I can't think of a reason why anyone might bemoan the £40 it takes to shoot Hodnet, as the birds there are a shooter's dream/nightmare (delete as appropriate).I honestly cannot see what all the fuss is about Registered shoots.Many grounds find that registered are a nuisance to put on and often add unnecessary expense . Yes they are necessary to attain your average classification, but they certainly are not of a higher quality or a measure of ones ability. Hodnet & Cross Gun Kinver, are a prime example good courses but not registered.
I honestly cannot see what all the fuss is about Registered shoots.Many grounds find that registered are a nuisance to put on and often add unnecessary expense . Yes they are necessary to attain your average classification, but they certainly are not of a higher quality or a measure of ones ability. Hodnet & Cross Gun Kinver, are a prime example good courses but not registered.
I honestly cannot see what all the fuss is about Registered shoots.Many grounds find that registered are a nuisance to put on and often add unnecessary expense . Yes they are necessary to attain your average classification, but they certainly are not of a higher quality or a measure of ones ability. Hodnet & Cross Gun Kinver, are a prime example good courses but not registered.
could not agree more with you SalopianYes but what is this all to do with how much we pay for our shooting?
Many of us would not dream of parking in a field and shooting 50 off five manual traps, and by the same token many of us could not afford to shoot at H&H , West London, E.J.Churchill & RBSS, but does it mean we enjoy our sport less? of course not it is different strokes for different folks.
PmslI agree with chard. No point to it IMO unless its competitive. As for cost most shooting sports have historically been expensive thats what keeps the rif raf out. Thank god cos i have no time for rif raf
Enter your email address to join: