- Joined
- Jan 15, 2020
- Messages
- 617
I'm just off to find a mirror.
Personally I think It’s embarrassing. I’d say there’s a lot of bad form displayed here, bucket loads of arrogance and a huge dollop of ‘having the last clap’ syndrome. Sadly non of which wasn’t to be expected.Reading this thread is about as comfortable as explaining to a group of 5 women which one of them has the correct size bottom.
Will, you should know by now that they all do, unless you have a death wishReading this thread is about as comfortable as explaining to a group of 5 women which one of them has the correct size bottom.
Disagree on dominance being purely neurological. Recently my prescription in my dominant eye changed, and caused eye dominance issues, as my off eye was better than my dominant eye. New glasses and now back to normal. Your brain can only interpret what your eyes can see.Re. Eye dominance. Because eye dominance is neurological ie nothing to do with eye strength, diagnosing it with 100% accuracy is difficult. Some coaches will have you do the familar finger point to "prove" which is your dominant eye but this does not prove the degree of dominance. If 95% of the optic nerve "hook-ups" go to the right master eye and 5% to the off eye, the shooter can possibly shoot successfully with both eyes open. However, if 55% of the hookups connect to the master eye, 45% to the "off" eye, he will still test right eye dominant, but on occasion, depending on several things, because the dominance is not conclusive, the wrong eye can kick in and he will miss. That's why some TOP shooters wear an occluder. Of course, some coaches will happily tell you that you must keep both eyes open, you have occasions when because of this problem shoot badly because they don't want to identify it to suck you in for more and more lessons "Keep trying, you'll get it eventually." Of course after multiple lessons, you never do.
I’m not drawing reference to the original question that was asked more the **** swinging that went on afterwards that I personally feel should have happened via PM and not publicly which does nobody’s rep any good. Makes great TV but FFS this is social media, should know better, or maybe that’s the whole point and purpose. Any press is better than no press ethos.TK421 – I understand what you are saying but to seek clarification should we all shut up ? I would be interested in knowing whether others employ maintained lead and/or value a ‘unit lead’ type approach or whether it is not considered relevant to Sporting clays. I think that’s a valid topic for discussion as opposed to ‘who’s the best’.
Kind of proving my point. If the image from an eye is degraded, either by poor vision or from removing information from that eyes picture, then the brain can only process information it has. Then surely the eye providing better data to the brain will be the dominant one?Daz W Sorry, but I don't agree on the dominance because it is a very complicated subject. As an example multi Olympic gold medalist Kim Rhode can shoot a good score with both eyes open, but only repeatable perfect scores with the occluder. And she struggled for years with this.
If you let the clay pass and swing through it at Ol. Skeet you will be too slow on the pairs. Will work on other, not so fast skeet disciplines, but not on Ol. Skeet. The singles will work with swing through.I shoot (Olympic) skeet almost exclusively (save for the Sporting skeet nationals and a little practice for same) and would not advise a beginner to shoot maintained lead on any skeet target. In my view, to shoot maintained lead you have to know trajectory and speed of the clay, which takes some getting used to. ML also requires a particularly consistent mount and swing speed. I use a little maintained lead on pairs at stations 3, 4 and 5, but shoot everything by letting the clay pass the barrel first. Maybe that's why I cannot compete with the likes of Vincent Hancock, but I can hold my own among lesser mortals.
Enter your email address to join: